SVB and Signature Bank Collapse: What You Need to Know

What Happened?

The wounds of the 2008 financial crisis cut deep. So unsurprisingly when another US bank fails, everyone sits up and takes notice. This past weekend, Silicon Valley Bank collapsed (2nd largest failure in history), creating a deposit crisis among other regional banks, and sending shockwaves through the entire industry.

Large Federal Response

The FDIC, Treasury, and Federal Reserve announced on Sunday that all deposits at SVB were fully guaranteed under an exception to the $250k deposit insurance cap known as a systemic risk exception designed to stem high-level crises in the banking system beyond a single institution. In addition to the deposit guarantee (which mean that customer operations will open as normal), the Federal Reserve and Treasury also announced that they would create a new term funding facility (the Bank Term Funding Program or BTFP) to allow banks to meet deposit requests.

The question for investors is whether the sell-off was a one-off triggered by problems unique to SVB, or whether it was a sign of broader weaknesses in the US banking sector. We believe both are true. While SVB failed because of bank specific dynamics, the Fed’s aggressive rate hike policy revealed their weakness and perhaps this is just the first crack to an already unstable economy. Even though the situation is fluid, it is possible to highlight a few important points.

SVB Was Unique…

First, the good news — Silicon Valley Bank was a unique situation in that:

  1. most of its deposits came from corporations rather than individuals,
  2. the bank was aggressive in lending to start-up businesses (especially in technology)
  3. the bank grew extremely rapidly
  4. the bank was very aggressive in the management of its balance sheet.

When technology firms experienced a tougher economic environment over the last year, they needed liquidity via some of their deposits back. To meet these needs, last week SBV announced it would liquidate $20B+ of its investments in government securities (at a loss due to severely higher rates). This incited fear among its entire client base, resulting in a $42 billion run on the bank in which clients withdrawing deposits forced further liquidation of the bank’s investments. While the Bank might have been able to survive one of these issues, combining all these factors is a certain recipe for disaster. 

SVB’s balance grew 250% between early 2019 and the end of 2022

SVB's balance grew 250% between early 2019 and the end of 2022

US bank balance sheet growth, 1Q 2019 – 4Q 2022
JPMAM, Bloomberg, Gavekal Research/Macrobond

With few retail deposits, SVB had a high-risk deposit base

With few retail deposits, SVB had a high-risk deposit base

JPMAM, Gavekal Research/Macrobond

…However, May Not Be Alone

The other half of this story is the Federal Reserve. We need to remember a year ago the Fed funds rate was 0-0.25% and the yield curve 40bps steep; today Fed funds rate is 4.5-4.75% (heading toward 6%) and yield curve 100bps inverted. An inverted yield curve disrupts the whole bank business model of borrowing short to lend long.

US Fed Funds Target Rate %

Source: BofA Global Investment Strategy, Bloomberg, Global Financial Data

When the Federal Reserve starts to raise interest rates, it generally keeps doing so until something breaks. Well, something just broke. It was only a week ago that Federal Reserve chair Jay Powell promised to continue fighting inflation with tighter monetary policy, even suggesting the Fed could reaccelerate rate hikes. On Sunday, the Fed was promising to hose the system down with emergency liquidity to head off any deterioration of confidence in other institutions. Next, ahead of their March 21-22 meeting, Fed policymakers will have to reconsider the future course of interest rate hikes and quantitative tightening.

What This Means?

The federal government stepped in to forestall the worst-case scenarios for a potentially broader financial sector (and tech sector) issue, but it also creates moral hazard. The response has been notable and will have both intended and unintended ramifications down the line. With deposits at US banks having essentially been backstopped by the actions of the Federal Government, one could argue that the banking system has been de facto nationalized, and the consequences of that are completely unknown. In turn, this event will only benefit bigger banks, which we are less concerned about for systematic failure. We anticipate more idiosyncratic problems, but big banks are still much better capitalized than 2008.

Implied Fed Fund Rate (%) After January 2024 FOMC Meeting

However, when banks fail, it is hard to be confident about the trajectory of the economy, even if these are idiosyncratic problems and not signs of banking system collapse. As a result, unless the Fed’s policymakers want to end up making another policy mistake (rates too low for too long following COVID), they are likely to press pause on rate hikes and quantitative tightening, if not on March 22, then soon after. Fed Funds Futures are pricing a dramatic shift in expectations.

If the Fed does pivot, this episode might have seen an accelerated bottom for the cycle. If the Fed pushes back, and reaccelerates rate hikes, the market will potentially need to see more pain. Upcoming inflation data will be more important than ever. We will continue monitoring financial conditions during this pivotal spot for asset markets.

You can get more information by calling (800) 642-4276 or by emailing

Photo of John ForlinesBest regards,

John A. Forlines III
Chief Investment Officer

The opinions expressed herein are current as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Nothing in this Markets in Motion is intended as investment, tax or legal advice. Such advise should be sought from your financial, tax or legal advisors as appropriate. This Markets in Motion is neither an offer to sell nor a recommendation to buy any security or financial instrument.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Performance prior to January 1, 2018 was earned on accounts managed at a predecessor firm, JAForlines Global. The person primarily responsible for achieving that performance continues to manage accounts at Donoghue Forlines in a substantially similar manner. The material contained herein as well as any attachments is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is presented only to provide information on investment strategies, opportunities and, on occasion, summary reviews on various portfolio performances. The investment descriptions and other information contained in this Markets in Motion are based on data calculated by Donoghue Forlines LLC and other sources including Morningstar Direct. This summary does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities and may not be relied upon in connection with any offer or sale of securities. The views expressed are current as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. There can be no assurance that markets, sectors or regions will perform as expected. These views are not intended as investment, legal or tax advice. Investment advice should be customized to individual investors objectives and circumstances. Legal and tax advice should be sought from qualified attorneys and tax advisers as appropriate. The calculation and presentation of performance has not been approved or reviewed by the SEC or its staff.

The Donoghue Forlines Global Tactical Allocation Portfolio composite was created July 1, 2009. The Donoghue Forlines Global Tactical Income Portfolio composite was created August 1, 2014. The Donoghue Forlines Global Tactical Growth Portfolio composite was created April 1, 2016. The Donoghue Forlines Global Tactical Conservative Portfolio composite was created January 1, 2018. The Donoghue Forlines Global Tactical Equity Portfolio composite was created January 1, 2018.

Results are based on fully discretionary accounts under management, including those accounts no longer with the firm. Individual portfolio returns are calculated monthly in U.S. dollars. These returns represent investors domiciled primarily in the United States. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance reflects the re-investment of dividends and other earnings.

Regarding GTA, net returns are presented net of actual management fees and include the reinvestment of all income. Actual investment advisory fees incurred by
clients may vary.

Beginning January 1, 2022, the 1% model fee was no longer assessed within the performance calculation as Donoghue Forlines no longer charges a model management fee on the portfolios listed below. The portfolios includes holdings on which Donoghue Forlines may receive management fees as the adviser and/or subadvisor or from separate revenue sharing agreements. Please see the prospectuses for additional disclosure.

Regarding GTI, GTC, GTG, and GTE, the investment management fee schedule for the composites is: Client Assets = All Assets; Annual Fee % = 0.00%. Actual investment advisory fees incurred may vary and should be confirmed with your financial advisor.

The Donoghue Forlines Global Tactical Allocation Benchmark is the HFRU Hedge Fund Composite. The Blended Benchmark Conservative is a benchmark comprised of 80% HFRU Hedge Fund Composite and 20% Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate, rebalanced monthly. The Blended Benchmark Growth is a benchmark comprised of 80% HFRU Hedge Fund Composite and 20% MSCI ACWI, rebalanced monthly. The Blended Benchmark Income is a benchmark comprised of 60% HFRU Hedge Fund Composite and 40% Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate, rebalanced monthly. The Blended Benchmark Equity is a benchmark comprised of 60% HFRU Hedge Fund Composite and 40% MSCI ACWI.

The MSCI ACWI Index is a free float adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets. The HFRU Hedge Fund Composite USD Index is designed to be representative of the overall composition of the UCITS-Compliant hedge fund universe. It is comprised of all eligible hedge fund strategies; including, but not limited to equity hedge, event driven, macro, and relative value arbitrage. The underlying constituents are equally weighted. The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index is a flagship measure of global investment grade debt from twenty-four local currency markets. This multi-currency benchmark includes treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers.

Index performance results are unmanaged, do not reflect the deduction of transaction and custodial charges or a management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing indicated historical performance results. You cannot invest directly in an Index. Economic factors, market conditions and investment strategies will affect the performance of any portfolio, and there are no assurances that it will match or outperform any particular benchmark.

Policies for valuing portfolios, calculating performance, and preparing compliant presentations are available upon request. For a compliant presentation and/or the firm’s list of composite descriptions, please contact 800‐642‐4276 or

Donoghue Forlines LLC is a registered investment adviser with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

John A. Forlines, III
Chief Investment Officer

January 2024 Market Commentary

First off … thank you! Another year is in the books and we are grateful to all our Advisors, Fiduciaries, Brokers, and Partners who trust us with your business